Accueil > Centre de ressources > Comparing Peer Reviews : The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human (...)

Comparing Peer Reviews : The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism

The Universal Periodic Review Mechanism (UPR) of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) reflect a growing trend in international organizations to utilize peer review processes to assess and improve member state governance and human rights performance. The two mechanisms are distinct in many ways. For example, the APRM undertakes a more in-depth and rigorous examination of a broader range of issues. Both review mechanisms, however, also have similarities e.g. they emphasize follow-up and actions to be taken as a result of the reviews and are products of a consensus decision-making process based on voluntary engagement. They represent an evolutionary process by which international norms can be integrated in a national context.

African and Asian Studies
Volume 12, Issue 3, 2013
ISSN : 1569-2094
E-ISSN : 1569-2108
Authors : Edward R. McMahon ; Kojo Busia ; Marta Ascherio
pp. 266–289 (24)

Publié le 17 octobre 2013

Suivez nos tweets Suivez nous sur facebook Google+